Monday, September 26, 2016

Wayne Madsen: Hillary Clinton’s Private Email Was Front End for a Private Foreign Policy/Intelligence Operation

Public Intelligence Blog
September 26, 2016

Wayne Madsen

A mere cursory glance at some of Hillary Clinton’s emails yields what can only be described as a private foreign policy and intelligence operation. The operation involved Secretary of State Clinton, her personal State Department staff and outside consultants (including Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills), the Clinton Foundation (including Bill Clinton and daughter Chelsea Clinton), former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and Teneo, the global advisory firm established by Bill Clinton’s former chief aide Doug Band and that employed Abedin as a consultant while she was also working for the State Department.

Teneo’s advisory board included Bill Clinton and Blair and one of its major clients was the Clinton Foundation. Other key members of the private Clinton team were Jeffrey Feltman, the pro-Israeli Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs who now enjoys diplomatic cover as Under Secretary General of the United Nations for Political Affairs; Mrs. Clinton’s special assistant counselor Nora Toiv; senior adviser to the Secretary of State Bathsheba Crocker; State’s director of policy planning Anne-Marie Slaughter; U.S. envoy to the Syrian rebels Robert Ford; special advisor to the assistant secretary of state for Europe and Eurasia Jeremy Shapiro; Clinton’s deputy chief of staff Jacob Sullivan (the likely national security adviser in a Clinton administration and who is linked to former Connecticut Senator Joseph Lieberman), and the pro-Israeli private intelligence team at Stratfor, located in Austin, Texas.
A September 23, 2011 email is illustrative of some of the private foreign policy network. Mrs. Clinton not only permitted her odd cabal of pro-Israelis and one Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer, Abedin, help target Qaddafi and Assad but they were also involved in undermining the government of Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati, whose government included followers of Maronite leader Michel Aoun and Hezbollah. The Clinton team appeared to like the term applied to Mikati in one article on Lebanon: “dead man walking.”
One email sent through Clinton’s private server located at her home in Chappaqua, New York and marked “PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL” concerns back channel intelligence information received by Mrs. Clinton’s close confidante and Clinton Foundation consultant Sidney Blumenthal. Apparently, Blumenthal received the intelligence, which involved the civil war in Libya promoted by the Obama administration, from the Central Intelligence Agency via one of Blumenthal’s contacts, retired CIA European division chief Tyler Drumheller. Drumheller died in 2015 from pancreatic cancer.
The email was sent to Mrs. Clinton on September 12, 2012, the day U.S. ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three other U.S. diplomatic personnel were killed when an armed jihadist group stormed a U.S. facility in Benghazi. The email passed on intelligence gleaned from the Libyan president Muhammad Yussef el Magariaf that the attack on the U.S. facility was carried out by Ansar al Sharia, led by the former Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) of General Abdelhakim Belhadj. The LIFG was affiliated with Al Qaeda. However, Stevens was also designated the chief U.S. liaison to Belhadj and had met with the terrorist leader to coordinate military action against Qaddafi. Under CIA supervision, Belhadj met with leaders of the anti-Assad “Free Syrian Army” in Istanbul in November 2011.
Magariaf and Egypt’s then president, Mohamed Morsi, were close allies and also members of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is known that Stevens was brokering deals that would ship Libyan arms, captured from the arsenals and caches of ousted Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, to Syrian jihadists trying to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al Assad. Mrs. Clinton’s close aide, Huma Abedin, reportedly has links to the Muslim Brotherhood through her mother. Before he was killed by the armed attackers, Stevens met in Benghazi with a Turkish envoy, Turkish Consul General in Benghazi Ali Sait Akin, who was tasked with overseeing the Libyan arms transfers to the Syrian rebels through southern Turkey.
Other Clinton emails describe how Qaddafi received military assistance from Assad to help put down the jihadist rebellion that began, with CIA, NATO, and Israeli assistance, in eastern Libya. The operation involving Stevens now appears to have relied on Clinton’s private server for coordination purposes and as a way to segment the Libyan arms-for-Syria deal from other U.S. government agencies. It is also known that everything  the Clinton Foundation became involved in also carried a large cost as far as donations to the foundation were concerned. Stevens and three of his Benghazi personnel, along with Drumheller, are dead and as the Clintons know very well, dead men tell no tales. As is the case with every secret Middle East arms deal, there are profits to be made. Israel received a five percent profit when the U.S. secretly sold Iran weapons, through Israeli middlemen, during the Reagan administration. It is certain that the Turks made a profit on the sale of Libyan weapons to the Syrian rebels. Just how much of the Turkish profit ended up in the Clinton Foundation’s coffers?
A September 18, 2012 email from Blumenthal to “H” [Hillary] was marked CONFIDENTIAL but this was not a U.S. government classification but a private one used by Blumenthal, Clinton, and their associates. So, not only did Clinton maintain a private intelligence and foreign policy operation but she employed her own classified information management system. Both are egregious violations of U.S. national security law, as well as National Archives and Records Administration statutes and regulations. The Blumenthal memo to Clinton focuses on Assad and his and his family’s fears that they would meet the same fate as Assad’s ally Qaddafi. Mrs. Clinton laughed when Qaddafi was killed by CIA-supervised Libyan jihadis in Sirte and boasted, “We came, we saw, he died!”
Just as Qaddafi died in his ancestral home of Sirte, Blumenthal informs Clinton that Assad’s family home is in Qardaha, outside of predominantly Alawite Latakia. There is an indication that if Assad fled to Latakia, where his fellow Alawites and a Russian military base could protect him at least temporarily, Qardaha might also serve as Assad’s “Sirte,” where he and his family could be assassinated as easily as it was to assassinate Qaddafi in Sirte. Blumenthal tells Clinton in the email that if Assad fled to Latakia it would represent a “very short lived endgame.” Blumenthal also informs Clinton that Assad, unlike Qaddafi, is not willing to fight to the death. In fact, Qaddafi was not willing to fight to the death either. His motorcade was driving under the white flag of surrender to a site designated by Clinton’s State Department where he would turn himself into U.S. and NATO authorities. However, Mrs. Clinton had no desire to have Qaddafi reveal the chicanery of the United States before a trial in The Hague. The Qaddafi motorcade was attacked with the approval of Mrs. Clinton and Qaddafi was brutally sodomized before he was bayoneted and shot to death, all of which greatly amused the Secretary of State.
At one point in the September 18 email, Blumenthal confuses the Libya and Syria actions by writing, “Assad does realize that if he eventually forced to flee Libya [sic] and is unable to reach Russia or another allied state, he will be detained and face a trial  for human rights violations at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.” In a February 24, 2012 CONFIDENTIAL email from Blumenthal to Clinton there is a proposal that Assad and his family be allowed to flee to “Russia, Iran, or perhaps even India or Venezuela.” However, there is little doubt that as far as the Clinton team was concerned, there would never be trials or safe passage for either Assad or Qaddafi. They, like Iraq’s executed Saddam Hussein, knew too much about the questionable dealings of successive U.S. administrations, to be allowed to live. That Clinton was sent an article terming Lebanese Prime Minister Mikati as a “dead man walking” while also contemplating the deaths of Qaddafi and Assad also indicates that Mrs. Clinton had some sort of blood lust for male foreign leaders when she was Secretary of State. And that points to some sort of psychiatric problem with Mrs. Clinton.
The Republican-led House hearings on “Benghazi” never delved into how much of Clinton’s private intelligence and military operations were conducted outside the framework of the National Security Acts of 1947 and 1952. If Clinton was busy authorizing operations to remove Qaddafi and Assad outside of the system of Presidential Findings that govern U.S. government clandestine operations against foreign nations and interests, it would constitute treasonous activities on the part of the Secretary of State.
The emails also show that Clinton was apt to agree to any action proposed by her extremely pro-Israeli private foreign policy team. A March 2, 2012 email proposes that the U.S. back Israel in unilaterally annexing the Israeli-occupied Syrian Golan Heights as a way of undermining Assad.
It is obvious that Mrs. Clinton and her husband, the ex-president, believed they had some sort of entitlement to run their own foreign and intelligence operations, and making a huge profit for their “non-profit” foundation in the process. In 2008, the Clinton’s believed that they would inherit the White House without a threat from inside their party. Barack Obama upset the Clintons’ plans in 2008. The Clintons merely changed the law and regulations to suit themselves and they effectively ran their own foreign policy, with the help of Blair and Teneo, for the duration of Obama’s first term. Obama’s philosophy of delegating authority proved to be disastrous with the Clintons running the State Department. And the Middle East, and eventually Europe, is paying dearly for the crimes of the Clintons and their cronies.

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Obama: Embrace World Government Because It ‘Enhances Our Security’

Mark Matheny
September 20, 2016

Here is Obama at the U.N. calling for nations including the United States to give up "some freedom of action" in order to embrace world government stating that it will ultimately enhance security.

Just remember these famous words as you watch the video.....

 "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  - Benjamin Franklin

Video Transcript:
During his U.N. speech, Obama advocated for giving up freedoms to achieve better security.
OBAMA: And we can only realize the promise of this institution’s founding to replace the ravages of war with cooperation if powerful nations like my own accept constraints. Sometimes I’m criticized in my own country for professing a belief in international norms and multilateral institutions, but I’m convinced in the long run giving up some freedom of action, not giving up our ability to protect ourselves or pursue our core interests but binding ourselves to international rules, over the long term, enhances our security.

‘70% of European Jews won’t go to shul on High Holy Days despite heightened security’

Jerusalem Post
September 20, 2016
French soldiers patrol the street in a Jewish neighbourhood near a religious school and a synagogue as part of the highest level of "Vigipirate" security plan after the Islamist attacks in Paris January 20, 2015. . (photo credit:REUTERS)

Seventy precent of European  Jews will not go to synagogue on Rosh Hashana or Yom Kippur this year, according to a poll released Tuesday. The survey was conducted last week by the European Jewish Association (EJA) and the Rabbinical Center of Europe (RCE) among a representative sample of 700 capital cities and communities in the periphery throughout Europe - from Britain in the west to Ukraine in the east.   

Respondents --which numbered 78-- included rabbis as well as Jewish community leaders, both religious and secular. The margin of error was ±4.9%. The pollsters explained that while the number of respondents is far lower than the number of communities represented, each respondent speaks for multiple communities as within certain cities and areas, many communities share similar characteristics. 
Read the entire article

Sunday, September 18, 2016

Hananiah, Azariah and Mishael

September 18, 2016

This was an article I wrote back in 1995. It was published in "The Faith" magazine. I recently found the magazine while cleaning out a closet. I hope you enjoy.

By Mark Matheny

   Many people today, when asked, will say they have either heard or read the story of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-nego, but few have heard the story of Azariah,Hananiah, and Mishael, which is the same story. I have checked many bible story indexes and they all seem to rafer the story of the three men by the names Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego.

These Names however, were not the original names of the three men which survived the fiery furnace of Daniel 3. Let's look at some points in the Scripture to find out the purpose behind the Chaldeans (Babylon) in changing these men's names.

In Daniel 1:1-4, we see that the tribe of Judah was taken captive by King Nebuchadnezzar. Keep in mind that Nebuchadnezzar was King of Babylon at this time. He picked certain men of the captivity of Judah to be taught the ways of the Chaldeans (Babylon) concerning language and literature to become the king's counselors.

Verse 6 says "Now from among the sons of Judah were Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah". These were the given Hebrew names. First of all, let's get an understanding of each of their names.

Daniel means "My Judge is El". Hananiah means "Yahweh has been gracious". Mishael means "El has heard". Azariah means "Yahweh has helped".

Certainly these four men knew the Creator they served by His original Name "YAHWEH".

Verse 7 says "Unto whom the prince of the eunuchs gave names; for he gave unto Daniel the name of Belteshazzar, and to Hananiah [the name of] Shadrach, and to Mishael [the name ] of Meshach, and to Azariah [the name] of  Abed-nego." Now let's understand the names given by the prince.

Belteshazzar means "Bel (Ba'al) protect his life". Shadrach means "Command of Aku (moon god)". Meshach means "Shadow of the prince". Abed-nego means "servant of Nego" (probably referring to "Nebo" the god of writing.) See Smith's Bible Dictionary under Abed-nego.

We can see the intent of the Chaldeans (Babylon) and the king Nebuchaddnezzar to take away the identity of these Hebrew men which had Hebrew names. He wanted them to forget the Creator they worshipped for false idols, "and changed the glory(esteeem) of the incorruptible Elohim into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things". Romans 1:23

There is a great contrast in the Hebrew names and the Chaldean (Babylon) given names. Hananiah, Azariah, Mishael and Daniel all identify who they serve - YAHWEH, Elohim.

Shadrach, Meshach,Abed-nego and Belteshazzar all represent or identify with heathenism and false worship.

The same thing is happening today! the king(satan) of Babylon (confusion) today is causing many to accept the heathen given titles of (L-rd) Ba'al, (G-d) Gad meaning good fortune and Ie-sous (Jes-s) or IeZeus.

Notice in verse 5 how the king wanted to feed them with rich meats and good wine. Verse 8 shows however that .... "Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king's food...". Proverbs 22:1 says " a good name is rather to be chosen than great riches..." I am sure Daniel did not accept the pagan name just as he refused the king's dainties, (however ch-rches accept jes-s, G-d and L-rd today because of the dainties of the Roman Ch-rch). Verse 8 continues ...."nor with the wine which he (the king) drank"... Daniel did not defile himself with the king's wine either. Proverbs 20:1 says "wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging; and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise." Daniel was wise!

Proverbs 23:1-3 says " When thou sittest to eat with a ruler , consider diligently what is before thee: and put a knife to thy throat, if thou be a man given to appetite. Be not desirous of his dainties; for they are deceitful meat". Daniel understood the intention of the king was to conform him and his Hebrew brethren to a system of false worship, and was wise not to partake in the king's dainties.

Today we are to be diligent in considering what dainties (doctrine) are being set before us in the ch-rchianity of today. We are to refuse man-made doctrines (meats-dainties) of Babylon ( nominal religion)  and serve only Yahweh.

Revelation 17:2 says "With whom the kings have committed fornication (corruption-lawlessness), and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk (blinded) with the wine of her (Babylon) fornication".

People today in nominal Chr-stianity have not considered diligently what is being put before them and have become drunk with Babylon's false and misguided teachings. When one is drunk he is most likely to stumble. Isaiah 28:7 says "But they also have erred through wine, and through strong drink are out of the way; the PRIEST and the PROPHET have erred through strong drink; they err in prophetic vision, they stumble in judgement".

We as servants of the Most High Elohim must stand firm holding fast our identity in Yahweh through Yahshua the Messiah ...... "from whom the whole family in heaven and earth is named". Ephesians 3:15

II Corinthians 6:16-18 says it plainly "And what agreement hath the temple of Yahweh with idols? For ye are the temple of the Living Elohim; As Yahweh hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their Elohim, and they shall be My people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith Yahweh, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.And will be a Father unto you, and you shall be My sons and daughters, saith YAHWEH the Almighty."

Sons and daughters, rejoice in the Wonderful Name of YAHWEH!

"Go ye forth of Babylon, flee ye from the Chaldeans, with a voice of singing declare ye, tell this, utter it even to the end of the earth;

Say ye, YAHWEH hath redeemed His servant Ya'aqob." Isaiah 48:20

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Trump: “I’m not running to be the president of the world, I’m running to be president of the United States,”

New York Post
September 15, 2016

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a lunch hosted by the Economic Club of New York on Sept. 15.Photo: Getty Images
Donald Trump outlined his economic vision Thursday, focused on putting America’s national interests first, as he called for robust economic growth, tax reform, reduced regulation and better trade deals.
“I’m not running to be the president of the world, I’m running to be president of the United States,” Trump said, assuring the Economic Club of New York that his plan is US-centric.
Trump gave specific goals — and policy details — urging the US “to start thinking big once again.”
“[I]t is time to establish a national goal of reaching 4 percent economic growth,” he said.
Robust economic growth, he said, would help America recover from its financial woes. “Over the next 10 years, our economic team estimates that under our plan, the economy will average 3.5 percent growth and create a total of 25 million new jobs.”
Trump proposed “bold new tax reform.” When the audience hesitated to applaud immediately, the Republican said, “Don’t worry, they’re going down,” referring to tax rates, “not up.”

Monday, September 5, 2016

North Korea fires three ballistic missiles as G20 leaders meet in China

September 5, 2016
A passenger watches a TV screen broadcasting a news report on North Korea firing three ballistic missiles into the sea off its east coast, at a railway station in Seoul, South Korea, September 5, 2016. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji

North Korea fired three ballistic missiles into the sea off its east coast on Monday, the South Korean and U.S. militaries said, as the leaders of the Group of 20 major economies held a summit in China, the North's main diplomatic ally.
The missiles were fired from a region south of the capital Pyongyang just after noon (10.00 p.m. ET) and flew about 1,000 km (600 miles), hitting Japan's air defense identification zone, South Korea's Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said.

"We are still analyzing details but this is a grave threat to our nation's security, and we express deep concern," the Japan Defence Ministry said in a statement.

TERROR CAMPS:The Global Agenda

TERROR CAMPS:The Global Agenda
Watch Full Length Movie Here

Libyan Violence: Globalist Plan for the Domination of Eurasia

Left-Right Paradigm and the Coming Election

More White House Propaganda... "The Unemployment Rate is Only 8.25%!!!!"

Defense Cuts Harmful to Economy or National Security?

The Obama Catholic Connection

The Globalists Plan for a Coming World Currency

Four Mega Banks Dubbed "The Four Horsemen of U.S. Banking"

New World Order Rising-Documentary

New World Order Rising-Documentary
Watch Here

FOX News
Find out Why Here...

My Other Passions

My Other Passions
Aikido and Iaido

Psalm for the Day